Anyways, after reading the story it was all I thought about for a few days. I liked it so much I was considering doing my research project on it for Scribbling women. In researching information on the story I came across an article on the author. The article spoke about Frances Harper as an African American writer. I was stunned. Although I had not really thought about the race or ethnicity of the author, all of a sudden it mattered so much in me knowing. I felt my whole perspective on the story had changed, because the whole time I pictured a white woman. This just wasn't a story on the 19th century women who depended on a man. This was for all the African American woman who not only were under the oppression of their men, but under the oppression of their race and ethnicity as well. This was a powerful message to woman of minorities, encouraging them to develop themselves completely. Of course, this was powerful no matter the woman, as it can be influential in any feminist opinion, however, I thought it was fascinating that she was indeed African American because it was not highlighted, emphasized or anything. Even thought I pictured a white woman, and finding out she was African American helped me understand her message more, I also kind of liked the fact that it wasn't being emphasized. I like the move towards we are all just people. Writing about causes. And we all have a cause.
This made me reflect on my previous post of authorship effecting the ability of understanding. I still think that applies here. There was no way of knowing the race or ethnicity of the author by reading the literature, and of course no such thing as it being harder to understand for it.However, I do believe that author experience, like I said in my previous blog, does indeed affect how we will interpret the message of the works, without pulling away from the outright feminist point in the first place.
No comments:
Post a Comment